![]() Pointing to statements made by a former FBI informant, they argue that the government’s investigation was motivated by religious discrimination. The Muslim men involved - Fazaga, Ali Malik and Yasser AbdelRahim - allege that they are among the targets of a multiyear surveillance effort focused on the Muslim community in southern California. Fazaga, originated in 2011 and has been slowly making its way through the court system since then. “The Supreme Court stated unambiguously that the men we represent can continue to pursue their claims that the FBI spied on them because of their religion,” said Arulanantham, co-director of the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at the UCLA School of Law.Īny further legal action will lengthen an already protracted battle. Inside a Muslim community’s effort to rein in the FBIĪhilan Arulanantham, one of the attorneys representing the Muslim men, said during the press conference that his team is “quite pleased” that the Supreme Court issued an “extremely narrow ruling.” He noted that the justices rejected the government’s request for the case to be fully dismissed.“Today’s decision addresses only the narrow question whether 1806(f) (of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) displaces the state secrets privilege,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito in the majority opinion. The justices made it clear that that there are many details left for the lower courts to work out. Circuit Court of Appeal’s misapplied a federal law governing how surveillance-related evidence can be used in court.įriday’s ruling did not address the religious freedom issues raised in the lawsuit, nor the broader question of when the government can invoke the “state secrets privilege” to get a case dismissed. In a unanimous decision, the justices overturned a lower court ruling in favor of Fazaga and his co-plaintiffs, determining that the 9th U.S. today we live to fight another day,” said Yassir Fazaga, one of the men alleging religious discrimination, during a Friday press conference. This outcome “could have been better, but. But the men and their attorneys say there’s an upside to the ruling, and they’ve vowed to continue pursuing their case. The Supreme Court on Friday dealt a blow to a group of California Muslims who say the FBI unlawfully surveilled them because of their faith. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |